Problem, Reaction, Solution
There is... little doubt that the American power elite has... planned and plotted... The
power elite is not altogether 'surfaced.'... With the wide secrecy covering their operations and decisions, the power elite
can mask their intentions, operations and further consolidation…. New men come into it [the power elite] and assume
its existence without question.
--from "The Power Elite" (1956) by Columbia University sociologist C. Wright Mills
The nation's immediate problem is that while the common man fights America's wars, the
intellectual elite sets its agenda. Today, whether the West lives or dies is in the hands of its new power elite: those who
set the terms of public debate, who manipulate the symbols, who decide whether nations or leaders will be depicted on 100
million television sets as 'good' or 'bad.' This power elite sets the limits of the possible for Presidents and Congress.
It molds the impressions that move the nation, or that mire it.
--from "The Real War" (1980) by President Richard Nixon
At the national level, this conditioning of the public might be brought about via certain
crises, such as a terrorist attack... For the sake of peace and security, people may be willing to give up certain of their
freedoms to some extent.
--from "The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed" (published July 2001, two months before the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001) by Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
Popular national radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh repeatedly refers to anyone who believes in a one-world government
conspiracy involving the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as a "kook." However, on his February 7, 1995 program, he remarked:
"You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked
or handpicked from an Ivy League school... Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government ... you've shown an aptitude to be
a good Ivy League type, and so you're plucked so to speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in
government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can
The Open Conspiracy
While there are conspiracies going on in the world today, the pursuit of world government now is no longer conspiratorial
in the sense of being hidden or secret. Rather, it's what socialist author H.G. Wells called "The Open Conspiracy," as prominent people such as Bill Clinton have openly written in support of world government. It will probably be a World Socialist Government, synthesizing western capitalism and eastern communism. In fact, Joseph Stalin in a speech at Sverdlov University in April 1924 pronounced that "the amalgamation and collaboration
of nations within a single world system of economy... constitutes the material basis for the victory of Socialism."
And regarding what world government will ultimately mean, it will be authoritarian and repressive, for as Lord Acton wrote:
"Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
In 1891, gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes formed a secret society, the "Society of the Elect", to "absorb
the wealth of the world" and "to take the government of the whole world", according to Rhodes. According
to Prof. Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University, in The Anglo-American Establishment, Rhodes' conspiratorial secret society lasted almost
60 years. By that time, enough members of the society and Rhodes Scholars had penetrated the areas of politics, economics, journalism and education, so that the society was simply replaced by a network
of power elite, who would openly pursue world government.
According to Quigley:
"The [Rhodes] scholarships were merely a façade to conceal the secret society, or, more
accurately, they were to be one of the instruments by which members of the secret society could carry out Rhodes' purpose."
And in case anyone doubts the credibility of Prof. Quigley regarding this matter, The Washington Post article (March 23, 1975) about him and his information obtained from the
power elite's "secret records" was titled "The Professor Who Knew
Cecil Rhodes' secret society was comprised of a small "Circle of Initiates" and a larger semi-secret "Association of Helpers" which formed Round Table Groups. Members of these groups along with members of the Fabian (Socialist) Society as well as "The Inquiry" (a group formed by President Woodrow Wilson's chief advisor, Col. Edward M. House) formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs in Great Britain, and its American branch, the CFR. Both Prof. Quigley in Tragedy and Hope and CFR member Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. in A Thousand Days have referred to the CFR as a "front" for the power elite. And in Men and Powers, former
West Germany chancellor Helmut Schmidt referred to the CFR as "the foreign policy elite," which prepared people for "top-level missions" in government and "other
centers of international policy" and "had very silent but effective ways of seeing to its own succession."
Members of Rhodes' secret society networked with Fabian Socialists, who established the London School of Economics in 1895. One early Fabian, H.G. Wells, in New Worlds for Old explained what he called "a plot," whereby heads of state would come and
go, but bureaucrats trained at the London School of Economics, for example, would remain in government making rules and regulations
furthering the goals of the Fabian Socialists.
Wells broke with the Fabians, not in terms of goals, but only in believing they should be open about them, as he explained the coming synthesis of western
capitalism and eastern communism into a world socialist government. In this regard, he authored The
Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928) and The New World Order
(1939), in which he said sovereign states (nations) would end and "countless people... will hate the
new world order... and will die protesting against it."
The power elite understood that it would be difficult to get the people of the world to accept a world government all at
once, and so a gradualistic approach was suggested. Association of Helpers member and Canadian Rhodes scholar P.E. Corbett in Post-War Worlds (1942) wrote:
"A world association binding together and coordinating regional groupings of states may evolve
toward one universal federal government... World government is the ultimate aim, but there is more chance of attaining it
by gradual development."
Freedom From War
More recently, at Mikhail Gorbachev's first "State of the World Forum" in 1995, Zbigniew Brzezinski (President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor) announced that
"[we] cannot leap into world government through one quick step,
but rather via progressive regionalization."
During the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the trend toward socialism was obvious, but even after World War II it continued, as U.S. Rep. Carroll Reece on April 6, 1956 delivered a speech saying, "We approach closer and closer to socialism,"
and "The foundation-financed cartel promotes the idea of government by an elite."
One of the elite was Rhodes scholar Walt Rostow who, in "The United States in the World
Arena" (1960), proposed "an end to nationhood as it has been historically defined."
He became Deputy National Security Advisor for President John F. Kennedy, whose Secretary of State was Rhodes scholar Dean Rusk, who in September 1961 issued "Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament
in a Peaceful World".
The same year "Freedom From War" was issued, another Rhodes scholar, Richard Gardner, became Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and three years later, while still in that position, authored "In
Pursuit of World Order". The Foreword to this book was written by Rhodes scholar Harlan Cleveland, who has been a CFR member, Ambassador to NATO, Director of International Affairs at the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, and Chairman of the U.S. Weather Modification Advisory Board. Cleveland's books include "The Third
Try at World Order", "Birth of a New World", and "The
Global Commons: Policy for the Planet".
How would "World Order" be pursued? In the April 1974 edition of the CFR's journal Foreign Affairs, Richard Gardner wrote in "The Hard Road to World Order", that it would involve "an
end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece." He believed that approach would "accomplish
much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault," and he further explained how GATT could
be involved in the process. Gardner would eventually become an advisor on the United Nations to CFR member Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign, after which he would become U.S. Ambassador to Spain, from which would come Marxist Javier Solana as the head of NATO with the support of the Clinton administration.
The Third Way
Bill Clinton had become a Rhodes scholar in the late 1960s with support from Prof. Quigley and Rhodes scholar U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, who had authored "Old Myths and New
Realities" (1964), announcing:
"Indeed, the concept of national sovereignty has become in our
time a principle of international anarchy... The sovereign nation can no longer serve as the ultimate unit of personal loyalty
During then Governor Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign, his Rhodes scholar roommate at Oxford University, CFR director Strobe Talbott, wrote in Time magazine (July 20, 1992) that
"perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all... But it has taken the
events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government."
For that article, Talbott would receive the World Federalist Association (WFA)'s "Norman Cousins Global Governance Award," and on June 22, 1993, President Clinton would send a congratulatory letter to the WFA regarding the award, saying that previous WFA president Norman Cousins had worked for world peace "and world government." President Clinton ended the letter by wishing the WFA "future success."
The WFA's objective is world federal government, and in 1994 it published "The Genius of Federation: Why World Federation
Is the Answer to Global Problems", in which it strategized:
"Let the U.N. establish new agencies such as the International Criminal Court... National
sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue. Eventually a world federation can be formally adopted
with little resistance."
In November 2003, the WFA merged with the "Campaign for United Nations Reform" to form a new organization called
"Citizens for Global Solutions" with the motto "Building a World
Community Under Law."
During his presidency, Bill Clinton would also develop a close relationship with British Prime Minister Tony Blair (a vice-president of Socialist International), whose "The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century" calling for "ethical socialism" was published
in September 1998 by the Fabian (Socialist) Society. And in The Washington Post (April 7, 1999), Rhodes scholar E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote "A
World Safe for Socialism," describing how the Democratic Leadership Council
"...found itself playing host... to four Western European leaders whose parties have socialist
and social democratic roots... All subscribe to versions of the 'Third Way' approach to politics that Blair and Clinton have
When Bill Clinton was first campaigning for the presidency, he took a "tough" stand concerning policy toward Communist China. However, over
the years of his presidency, his policies toward that nation took a dramatically more friendly shift. On ABC's "This Week" (March 15, 1997), Rhodes scholar and former Clinton administration communications director George Stephanopoulos (CFR member) revealed:
"There were a lot of reasons the president changed his policy on China... It had little to do with [Chinese] contributions."
And when Cokie Roberts on the same program, said, "It had more to do with American money," Stephanopoulos replied: " Council on Foreign Relations, Lehman Brothers, Goldman-Sachs, absolutely." Quite a few Rhodes scholars have occupied high-level positions with Goldman-Sachs over the years.
At this point, someone might say that they understand that Cecil Rhodes had a secret society to take over the world, and that Rhodes scholars like Robert Reich, Ira Magaziner, James Woolsey and others played important roles in the Clinton Administration. But, they might say, "That's all over, isn't it, now that
Clinton has left office?"
It's important to remember, though, in this regard what Prof. Quigley said in "Tragedy and Hope". He noted that William C. Whitney and others of wealth in the late 19th century developed a plan whereby they would control both major
political parties through financial contributions, and then have those parties alternate power so that the public would
think it had a choice.
Prof. Quigley said that Whitney's plan lasted about 16 years, and after that, the "Eastern Establishment" (power elite) moved
the Democrat and Republican presidential candidates toward the political center, "assiduously fostering
the process behind the scenes." Prof. Quigley also said "the process was concealed, as
much as possible," and Quigley himself believed
"the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the
rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy."
William C. Whitney and his son were members of Yale University's secret society Skull & Bones. And while Rhodes scholars were penetrating the areas of education, economics, journalism and politics, Skull & Bones member and Fabian Socialist ally Daniel Coit Gilman brought G. Stanley Hall to Johns Hopkins University, where he mentored Fabian Socialist ally John Dewey, the "father of progressive education," who said in "Individualism, Old and New" that "we are in for some kind of socialism."
In economics, Skull & Bones member Thomas Daniels was Chairman of the Board of Archer-Daniels-Midland transnational corporation, and Fabian Socialist John Maynard Keynes was promoting his debt-laden "Keynesian economics," which President Richard Nixon (CFR member) in a January 4, 1971 interview with Rhodes scholar Howard K. Smith said he had now adopted. On September 30, 2001 on "Fox News Sunday," Skull &
Bones member President George W. Bush's chief-of-staff Andrew Card also said he believed a combination of supply-side and Keynesian
economics works best.
In journalism, just as Rhodes scholars like Erwin Canham (president of the American Society of Newspaper Editors) and newsmen Howard
K. Smith and Charles Collingwood along with Fabian (Socialist) Society members like Walter Lippmann (member of "the Inquiry" and CFR founding member) became prominent Skull & Bones members, Richard Ely Danielson became publisher of Atlantic Monthly, Russell
Wheeler Davenport became editor of Fortune, William F. Buckley, Jr. became publisher of National Review, and Henry Luce became the founder of Time. Luce biographer Robert Herzstein wrote:
"Early on, young Harry [Henry Luce] learned that a powerful circle of contacts and friends could move the
In politics, Skull & Bones member William Howard Taft in 1912 lost his presidential re-election bid in a three-way race similar to that of 1992 when Skull & Bones member George H.W. Bush lost his re-election bid to Bill Clinton. In 1912, Taft lost to Gov. Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat whose chief advisor Col. Edward M. House had promoted in "Philip Dru: Administrator": "...socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." And in 1992, President George H.W.
Bush lost to Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton, who soon thereafter introduced a health care plan about which Milton Friedman on C-Span (Nov. 20, 1994) said:
"You can't think of a more Socialist program than the health care program that he [Bill Clinton] tried to get us to adopt."
Relevant to Prof. Quigley's reference to William C. Whitney's plan for an alternation of power and the power elite's promotion of Democrat and Republican presidential candidates whose
foreign policy views are similarly globalist, Skull & Bones member George W. Bush then succeeded Bill Clinton as president, but foreign policy remained basically the same, which is what the power elite want. George W. Bush, his father,
and Bill Clinton all supported such things as NAFTA, GATT, the World Trade Organization, U.N. peacekeeping operations, and "Most Favored Nation" trading status for Communist China. And like his father and Bill
Clinton, President George W. Bush (whose website for his presidential campaign of 2000 was [hosted] with "Illuminati Online")
has appointed notable CFR members to high-level positions in his administration. They include Colin Powell, Christine Todd Whitman, Elaine Chao, Condoleeza Rice and Robert Zoellick. Vice-President Dick Cheney is also a CFR member, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is a former CFR member.
In the presidential campaign of 2004, among the leading Democratic challengers to President Bush were General Wesley Clark (Rhodes scholar from Little Rock, Arkansas) and U.S. Senator John Edwards, whose primary domestic
policy advisor was Bruce Reed (Rhodes scholar who was President Clinton's Domestic Policy Council
deputy assistant). Though each of these candidates won a state's primary, U.S. Senator John Kerry has won far more primary states and is the presumptive Democratic nominee for President. Like President George W. Bush, Sen. Kerry is also a member of Skull & Bones, so whether the Democratic or Republican nominee wins the election in November 2004, a member of Skull & Bones will be
President. And like President Bush, Sen. Kerry has also supported NAFTA, GATT,
etc., which are vitally important to the power elite.
At this point, someone might argue that neither President George H.W. Bush nor his son, President George W. Bush, promotes Socialism per se, and that is correct. But it should be remembered that what is at work is a "process," and when President George H.W.
Bush gave us national education goals and his son's federal education budget is the largest ever, including an element of
"accountability" to the federal Department of Education, that cannot be considered a movement
away from socialism.
Similarly, when President George H.W. Bush and his son both show some deference to the U.N., which is overwhelmingly dominated by Socialist nations, that cannot be considered a movement away from a world socialist
government. Is there really any substantial difference between President George H.W. Bush saying the Gulf War against Iraq
was conducted under the authority of a U.N. resolution, and Bill Clinton saying on October 19, 1993 regarding Somalia that his administration is engaging in a political process "to see how we can...
do all things the United Nations ordered [us] to do"? And in case one doesn't believe the U.N. is pursuing world government
status, what else can one call it when the U.N.'s International Criminal Tribunal claims the right to indict even an elected
head of state of a sovereign nation and pursue him anywhere in the world?
Concerning the United Nations, one can find examples of both Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones involvement. At the suggestion of President Clinton, U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali made Rhodes scholar James Gustave Speth head of the U.N. Development Program. This was after Vice-President Bush in 1986 had recommended Skull & Bones member William Henry Draper III for the same position. Incidentally, Draper in 1977 had contributed $93,000 to Skull & Bones member George W. Bush's first company, Arbusto Energy, of which Salem bin Laden (Osama bin Laden's brother) was also a founder.
Regarding other Skull & Bones members around George H.W. Bush (whose brother, Jonathan [Bush], is a member), Christopher Buckley
(William F. Buckley, Jr.'s son) is a member of this Yale University secret society and was a speechwriter for Vice-President
Bush. And member Bruce S. Gelb (CFR member) was director of the U.S. Information Agency and later Ambassador to Belgium after Vice-President Bush became President. And regarding President George W. Bush, he appointed a number of fellow Skull & Bones members including Edward McNally (General Counsel
to the Office of Homeland Security), William Howard Taft IV (legal counsel to Secretary of State Colin Powell), and William Henry Donaldson (Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission).
...in the U.S. Government
In the U.S. Government, there has also been matching Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones involvement. In the executive branch, at the same time Rhodes scholar Strobe Talbott was becoming number two at the State Department, President Clinton had appointed Skull & Bones member Winston Lord (former CFR president) as an Assistant Secretary of State. And just as President John F. Kennedy had a number of Rhodes scholars at high levels in his administration, Skull & Bones members McGeorge Bundy and brother William Bundy occupied high-level positions then as well.
William Bundy also worked for the CIA as have other Skull & Bones members such as William F. Buckley, Jr., his brother James Buckley, William Sloane Coffin, Archibald MacLeish, Richard Bissell, F. Trubee Davison, Amory Bradford Howe (general manager of The New York Times form the mid-1940s until 1963),
Richard Drain, Howard Weaver, and Hugh Cunningham
(also a Rhodes scholar). Skull & Bones member George H.W. Bush actually headed the CIA as have Rhodes scholars Stansfield Turner and James Woolsey.
...in the Military
Regarding the military, Skull & Bones member Henry Stimson (who initiated George H.W. Bush into the same secret society) was Secretary of War in the administration of President Franklin Roosevelt, and President Clinton appointed Rhodes scholar Gen. Wesley Clark as head of NATO forces. President Clinton also appointed Rhodes scholar Richard Danzig as Secretary of the Navy
and Rhodes scholar Admiral Dennis C. Blair as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Pacific Command.
...in the Legislature
In the legislative branch, a number of Rhodes scholars and Skull & Bones members have been in Congress, and former U.S. Senator David Boren (CFR member) is both a Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones member, who on August 26, 1992 wrote an article in The New
York Times advocating a rapid deployment force for the U.N. to facilitate "the new world order." During the Clinton presidency,
Sen. Boren (as a Rhodes scholar) persuaded President Clinton to make George Tenet head of the CIA, and then Sen. Boren (as a Skull & Bones member) persuaded fellow Bonesman President George W. Bush to keep Tenet in that important position.
...in the Judiciary
In the judicial branch, the U.S. Supreme Court has included Skull & Bones members Potter Stewart and William Howard Taft (Chief Justice), and Rhodes scholars John Harlan, David Souter, and Byron White. One of Justice White's law clerks was Rhodes scholar David Kendall, who was also President Clinton's
attorney during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Outside of government, of course, Rhodes scholars and Skull & Bones members have also been involved in important areas
of American life, such as finance. Earlier it was mentioned how quite a few Rhodes scholars have worked for Goldman-Sachs over the years, and Skull & Bones members Averell Harriman, his brother E. Roland Harriman, and [Senator] Prescott Sheldon Bush (George H.W. Bush's father) were partners in Brown Brothers, Harriman and Co..
Problem, Reaction, Solution
These individuals have formed a network of power over the years, and although not every Rhodes scholar and Skull & Bones member has been plotting to take over the world, they are, for the most part, an elite whose globalist goals must be resisted
by Americans who oppose any diminution of our Constitutional freedoms or our national sovereignty.
How might this diminution occur? At the top of page 303 of my book, "The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed", published
in July 2001, I state:
"At the national level, this conditioning of the public might be brought about via certain
crises, such as a terrorist attack... For the sake of peace and security, people may be willing to give up certain of their
freedoms to some extent."
Then on September 11 2001, terrorists attacked the Pentagon near Washington, D.C., and the World Trade Center in New York
City, and a few hours later ABC News/Washington Post released poll results showing "two-thirds
say they would sacrifice some personal liberties in support of anti-terrorism efforts". Does this mean the power
elite plotted the attacks on September 11?
After all, didn't the public affairs website IndiaReacts.com report on June 26 that "...the U.S. and Russia plan 'limited military action' against the Taliban
if the contemplated tough new economic sanctions don't bend Afghanistan's fundamentalist regime"? And didn't the
PBS program "Jihad in America" in 1994 show radical Muslims speaking in the U.S. over a decade ago and saying they would attack
our airplanes and go after our high buildings? And in the same year of 1994, didn't Islamic terrorists hijack a plane in Algiers,
intending to fly the passenger aircraft full of fuel into a tall prominent structure, the Eiffel Tower, exploding the plane
Closer to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, didn't AirlineBiz.com on June 23, 2001 carry a report by a Muslim who had just interviewed Osama bin Laden and concluded that it was a race to see whether the U.S. would attack bin Laden first or he would attack the U.S. first?
Shortly after this report, didn't the Northwest Airlines flight attendants' website carry a "Backgrounder" by Washington
Times reporter Bill Gertz referring to "Project Bojinka" with hijacked airliners flying
into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and other buildings? Then on September 10, 2001, didn't some top
Pentagon officials suddenly cancel their travel plans for the next morning apparently because of security concerns, according
to two reports by Newsweek? And on the evening of September 10, 2001, eight hours before the terrorist attacks of September
11, didn't San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown's security people at the airport there call him before his flight to New York
City the morning of September 11 and advise him that he and all Americans should be cautious about their air travel
(see The San Francisco Chronicle, September 12, page A17)?
How could our leaders following the September 11 terrorist attacks here say that no one could have imagined such a thing
would occur? I filed a Freedom of Information request regarding any warnings, alerts, or emergency rulings by the FAA (Federal
Aviation Administration) or other government agencies pertaining to transportation between May 2001 and September 15 of that
year. The Department of Homeland Security replied they had found 12 relevant Information Circulars, but they would not let
me see them.
Wasn't Marcus Mabry's Newsweek Web Exclusive of September 15, 2001, about the terrorist attacks and their aftermath
titled, "Welcome to the New World Order"? And didn't Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien say
on September 29, 2001, that "there will probably be a new order in the world that will probably be
better than we have now"?
No, the power elite actually didn't plot the attacks of September 11 -- they didn't have to.
Remember that Rhodes' conspiracy ended as such around 1960 because enough like-minded globalists were in key positions in politics, economics,
education and journalism, and his conspiracy was no longer necessary (being replaced by a global network of power elite pursuing
world government). When a student several years ago went on a shooting rampage, the press rarely reported that he was stopped
by a teacher with a gun, because the press is overwhelmingly for gun control. The power elite did not have to call editors
of the nation's newspapers and tell them what to say.
Similarly, the power elite didn't call up terrorists and tell them to fly into the Pentagon and World Trade Center. However,
if I could forecast terrorist attacks, so can the power elite.
Rather, there is a dialectic at work here. You may recall that under at State Department contract, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield in 1962 wrote:
"A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which 'world government'
would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions, characterized by... some ability to employ physical
force... [But] if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government."
Interestingly, Bloomfield also wrote that the world government could come about by means of
"...a grave crisis or war to bring about a sudden transformation in national attitudes
sufficient for the purpose... The order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty,
and traumatic shocks."
Relevant to today, it is the reaction (public willingness to give up some Constitutional freedoms) to the action (terrorist
attack wherever and whenever and however it occurs) that is important to the power elite. Thus, they don't have to cause the
action, but only anticipate that it will occur sometime, and emphasize the public reaction to it to further their goals.
And in case anyone doesn't believe the power elite wants a diminution of our Constitutional freedoms and our national sovereignty,
just look at "Our Global Neighborhood: The Basic Vision", a document produced several
years ago by the Commission on Global Governance, whose work was supported by then U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Members of the Commission included Maurice Strong (Secretary-General of the Rio Earth Summit, co-author of the current Earth Charter, and right-hand man of U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan) and Barber Conable (former president of the World Bank). Among the Commission's proposals are that:
"...a new world order must be organized... In certain fields, sovereignty has to be exercised
collectively... The principle of sovereignty must be adapted in such a way as to balance... the interests of nations with
the interests of the global neighborhood... We strongly endorse community initiatives to... encourage the disarming of civilians...
We would like to see a permanent international criminal court instituted as a matter of the highest priority.... We are...
in need of a mobilizing principle... a new world order that secures the ascendancy of global neighborhood values over divisive
Of course, the public will have to be prepared to accept world government, and what better way to do that than via education.
The primary arm of the U.N. dealing with education is UNESCO, and in its first Director-General Sir Julian Huxley's "UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy" (1948), he wrote: "Political unification in some sort
of world government will be required."
On October 3, 2003, on the occasion of the U.S. rejoining UNESCO (after President Reagan had withdrawn the U.S.), U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige declared:
"The United States is pleased to return to UNESCO... Our governments have entrusted us
with the responsibility of preparing our children to become citizens of the world... UNESCO is a powerful forum for sharing
our views, developing a common strategy, and implementing joint action."
The problem with the concept of "world citizens" is that just as "citizens" of a state have to obey the laws of that state,
"citizens of the world" will be expected to obey world laws. And the clear majority of the world's nations are Socialist,
so that world laws will reflect a socialist perspective.
The conditioning of the public in the past has been gradual, but as famous author H.G. Wells noted, the process will speed up in the end as the synthesis toward a World Socialist Government gains greater momentum.
Hopefully, Americans will wake up before it's too late and resist this global effort on the part of the power elite.
Copyright © Dennis Cuddy 2004
Modern History Project